Jeff Jarvis, on the same page where he notes he’s leaving Advance Media, talks about the needs of news of the future. Reminds me of panel at a Nora Paul-hosted conference at U of Minn where we reached many similar conclusions. (If a confernece is in Minnesota and no one blogs it, did it happen?). Here’s my synopsis, in brief, under which you can see our longer contibutions: the issues future journalists/editors will grapple with: Convenience - someone gets what they want, when. You, as newsperson, may not know the device the consumer is using or how they’ll use it, and, thus, will not know how your news product is consumed; portability - anything, anywhere, any time. Manipulability- true customization, personalization, data-sifting. News organizations’ pre-set rubrics become much less relevant. Ubiquitous Collection - A Webcam on every lamppost? Ubiquitous Dissemination. Ease of Use/Intuitive - Both for the news gatherers and users of the devices that receive the news. Legal/Rights Issues - Will the government control and perhaps even sell access to “events” it “stages”? (”The Gulf War, Exclusively on CNN.”) If everyone is a news gatherer, and everyone can be in any piece of it at any time, even as a micro-bit of data, what are the potential privacy and legal issues?